System Analysis Sustainable Innovation

Question: Discuss about the System Analysis for Sustainable Innovation. Answer: Introduction: Stakeholder refers to an individual who has something to lose or gain in regards to the outcomes of the planning process of a project. Therefore, stakeholders engagement can be perceived as the effectively eliciting of stakeholders views in relation to the organization program or project. Hence, this means stakeholder mapping analysis could be perceived as a systematic process of gathering and analysis of the qualitative information which determines the interest that should be taken into account when trying to and implementing a certain program (Cho, 2007). Therefore, stakeholders characteristics include knowledge of policy, interest that could be related to policy, positioning against potential alliances, policy with stakeholders and the ability to affect the process of policy. Considering our scenario, we have to consider certain steps in mapping the stakeholders they are; planning process, selection and definition of policy, identification of primary stakeholders, collection and recording of information, analyzing the stakeholders table and using the information available. Therefore, the achievement as a result of stakeholders analysis develops useful and accurate data in regards to our healthcare reform aim. The information available could be used to provide input in other analyses such as the developmental action plans to increase support of the guide or reform policy participation (Singh et al, 2013). Therefore, in defining the purpose according to our case scenario first we need to understand the problem. In regards to our scenario the actual issue being perceived is that patients are complaining that they require testing instruments which could enhance their self health assessment. Hence, the actual issue here is that users perceive that remote monitoring tends to of significance because the vital signs tend to be transferred daily to the monitoring services, and in case a problem arises the service provider is notified (In Talen In Valeras, 2013). But, the main issue here is that the users are in need of better feedback in regards to their health conditions, and reduce their reliance on medical staff intervening, as well as attaining confidence in regards to understanding their situation and management of care. Therefore, to effectively implement or solve this situation the stakeholders mapping will be used in our scenario. In identification of stakeholders, there are different ways to identify stakeholders each having its risks and advantage. Hence, the analysis process should be able to realize the risks of the missing keys of stakeholders and the works that avoid these risks (Martin et al, 2010). Perhaps, we could first outline our stakeholders map in 4 quadrants with stakeholders such as internal operation, internal executives, external operations and external executives. As for the internal operators their main role is consider the internal variables that could be assessed in regards to operations being done by the firm. For the external operators they consider the external variables that could be assessed in regards to operation being done by the firm. Thirdly, the internal executives work on identifying the key variables that affect the capability of executives in the internal environment from performing or enhancement of the proposed program. On the other hand, external executives deal with variables that affect the capability in the external environment from or hinder the accomplishment of the set program. Therefore, we could term all these stakeholders to be responsible in the management and implementation of the set out strategy of providing independence to patient self healthcare assessment. The set of questions that are designed to reveal the stakes as well as assist in identification of the right people to involve in our situation will be: Who do you perceive will be affected either positively or negatively in regards to what you are proposing to do? Who tends to hold the relevant official position in regards to your participation of the proposal? Who runs the proposed program with relevant interest? Have you ever proposed or thought of a similar situation in the past? Whose name in regards to stakeholders pops up in your mind when you are discussing this subject of the laid out proposal? Below will be a list of the internal and external stakeholders in regards to the health department in our scenario: Internal stakeholders External stakeholders Trustees Research scientist Procurement Director of nursing Director of the public health Head of the health intelligence Communication Board committee members Public health managers Director of programs and services Providers Acute trust Service users Patients Funders Link group Health visitors/ nurses in school Media Special interest groups If one works in a commission rather than an organization that offers services, organizations such as in our scenario need to understand that the group of stakeholders (patients and service users) are important, because competitors will be less significant that the provider organizations. On the other hand, assessing the nature of each stakeholder influence tend to have a significance. Since, groups behave differently under certain circumstances it tends to be ital to understand them (Hare, 2008). For instance, if we understand the character of internal operator in our case it means that we can perceive whether they easily understand policy, strategy and project in dependent terms of the organization. Therefore, stakeholders are believed to set policies, project and strategies in regards to the organization (Max, 2012). Hence, this means that listing possible stakeholders such as in our case tends to create the required estimates which are influential and important. Thirdly, carrying out an investigation on stakeholder will help to determine their characteristics, interests, and situations in a better way. It is important that the stakeholders convey their own concern. Therefore, useful methodologies analysis should include: Brainstorming will help to generate ideas and identify issues within the stakeholder groups. The session form will help to record points that can be prioritized and sorted. The formation of focus group will help to discuss on the topic with the stakeholders. An informal checklist of issues in semi-structured interviews is commonly used to guide the interview with the stakeholder group. The following approach is useful to cross-check; identify common ground, determination of the decision-making frameworks, and identification of the tradeoffs of stakeholders. Time lines can be constructed with the stakeholders of history links and the impacts of institutions, processes, and policies with the discussion of effect and cause of different changes. Diagrams help to get an idea of what would be the overall plan. Therefore, they help to motivate discussions by both literate and non-literate people. However, in general visualizations and diagrams work as because they gives focus on discussing issues, stimulate ideas, representing complex issues and therefore help in decision-making (In Abdibi, 2015). Some stakeholder influences and interests are therefore much more apparent than others. It is significant to remember that interests are difficult to describe - they may be multiple, hidden, or in contradiction with the objectives or aims of the organizations to which the stakeholders belong (Jeffries Battin, 2012). Some of these influences and interests are likely to disclose themselves slowly only, for reasons of personal or political expediency, whilst others, may have to be left well alone. Fourth, in regards to patterns and contexts of interaction between stakeholders, the four Rs tend to be the tool used in assessing our stakeholders responsibilities, rights, rewards and relationship with other groups. Lastly, assessing the results in regards to our stakeholder we could perceive that their recommendations are that the attainance of independence by patient in regards to monitoring their health tends to be an effective strategy of treating patients. But, some tend to believe that the implementation of such a program could yield negative results in terms of patient care. This is because medical specialists are professions and have adequate knowledge in terms of healthcare delivery. Therefore, having user monitor their own care could lead to negative response in terms of healthcare delivery. Thus, in regards to the results of our stakeholders analysis we could agree that the proposal should not be implemented as it may affect the quality of healthcare. Case Diagram Actor Actor represents the role of the user of the IT system. It is significant in the IT system to determine and evaluate the role of the users. In many IT system, the role describes the users should log in into the systems. Use case Use case describes interactions and communications that take place between IT systems and actors while the execution of the processes. It represents the functionally of IT system and also enables the users to access the functionally. Association Association is the relationship between the actor or check in employee and the use case. Therefore, it shows that the actor execute and accomplish the use case. Include Relationships Include relationship describe the relationships between the use cases. Therefore, it shows arrow points describing the use case within the diagram. The figure shows a model of the relationship. The use case shows express check point in the diagram at which case is producing boarding pass. It shows that the whole process of generating boarding pass that is carried out. References In Adibi, S. (2015).Mobile health: A technology road map Jeffries, P. R.,Battin, J. (2012).Developing successful health care education simulation centers: The consortium model. New York: Springer Pub. Co. Jorna, R. J. (2006).Sustainable innovation: The organisational, human and knowledge dimension. Sheffield: Greenleaf. Hare, K. (2008).Perception Gaps and the Adoption of Information Technology in theClinical Healthcare Environment. Martin, L. T., Fremont, A. M., Felton, A., Ruder, T., Bird, C. E., Miyashiro, L., Hanson, M., ... Missouri Foundation for Health. (2010).A prototype interactive mapping tool to target low health literacy in Missouri. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. In Talen, M. R., In Valeras, A. B. (2013).Integrated behavioral health in primary care: Evaluating the evidence, identifying the essentials. New York, NY: Springer. Singh, A., Gonzalez, E. T., Thomson, S. B. (2013).Millennium development goals and community initiatives in the Asia Pacific. New Delhi: Springer India. Ma, X. (2012).Rfid-based business process and workflow management in healthcare: Design and implementation. Cho, S. (2007).A contextualist approach to telehealth innovations.